Three Dimensional Measurement of Terrain Surfaces Slopes and Complex Geometries Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning
Keywords:
Point cloud, Survey design, Surface reconstruction, Change detection, Measurement uncertaintyAbstract
Terrestrial laser scanning provides dense three-dimensional observations of visible surfaces, but engineering reliability depends on the complete measurement chain. This technical article explains how ranging principles, angular sampling, scan geometry, registration, classification and surface reconstruction are connected when measuring terrain, slopes and complex objects. A task-based workflow distinguishes bare-earth terrain models from full three-dimensional rock-face and object representations. It identifies the role of independent control, withheld checkpoints, surface-normal comparisons and explicit treatment of occlusions. Analytical examples demonstrate the effects of oblique incidence on point spacing, vertical bias on volume estimation and uncertainty on change detection. These examples are calculated scenarios and do not represent a new field experiment. The central outcome is a reproducible approach in which model acceptance depends on coverage, reference-system consistency, geometric fidelity and independently assessed uncertainty. The article clarifies why point count and internal registration residuals alone cannot establish product accuracy, and explains how complementary surveying and imaging methods can extend coverage when their observations are controlled and verified.
References
[1] Alptekin, A., Çelik, M. Ö., & Yakar, M. (2019). Modelling of a sea cliff with terrestrial laser scanning. In International Symposium on Applied Geoinformatics (ISAG-2019) (pp. 199–202).
[2] Yakar, M., & Karabacak, A. (2023). Giyilebilir mobil LiDAR ve uygulamaları. Atlas Akademi. ISBN 978-625-8101-40-9.
[3] Karabacak, A., & Yakar, M. (2023). Incorrect use of wearable mobile LiDAR: Example of Mersin Soli Beach and Ankara National Library underpass. Intercontinental Geoinformation Days, 7, 234–237.
[4] Dörtbudak, E. B., & Akça, Ş. (2024). Comparing photogrammetry and smartphone LIDAR for 3D documentation: Kızılkoyun Necropolis case study. Advanced LiDAR, 4(1), 19–27.
[5] Yildiz, F., Karabork, H., Yakar, M., Altuntas, C., Karasaka, L., & Goktepe, A. (2007). 3D modelling by advanced total station. In XXI International CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece.
[6] Koca, M., & Kozlu, H. H. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using TLS techniques in monumental buildings; Darsiyak Yanartaş Monastery Archangel Michael and Gabriel Church example. Advanced LiDAR, 1(1), 1–5.
[7] Albayrak, M., & Büyükmıhcı, G. (2021). Survey process of Gesi pigeonry with ground laser by (point cloud) scanning method. Advanced LiDAR, 1(1), 6–17.
[8] Güleç Korumaz, S. A. (2021). Terrestrial laser scanning with potentials and limitations for archaeological documentation: A case study of the Çatalhöyük. Advanced LiDAR, 1(1), 32–38.
[9] Besl, P. J., & McKay, N. D. (1992). A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791
[10] Zhang, W., Qi, J., Wan, P., Wang, H., Xie, D., Wang, X., & Yan, G. (2016). An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060501
[11] Kuçak, R. A., & Büyüksalih, İ. (2023). Comparison of CSF ground filtering method by using airborne LiDAR data. Advanced LiDAR, 3(2), 47–52.
[12] Sarıtaş, B., & Kaplan, G. (2023). Enhancing ground point extraction in airborne LiDAR point cloud data using the CSF filter algorithm. Advanced LiDAR, 3(2), 53–61.
[13] Sarıtaş, B., & Kaplan, G. (2024). Comprehensive study on enhanced accuracy analysis of LIDAR data: The example of Skopje. Advanced LiDAR, 4(1), 9–18.
[14] Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981). Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1145/358669.358692
[15] Kuçak, R. A. (2022). The feature extraction from point clouds using geometric features and RANSAC algorithm. Advanced LiDAR, 2(1), 15–20.
[16] Yakar, M., Yılmaz, H. M., & Mutluoğlu, Ö. (2008). Lazer tarama teknolojisi ve fotogrametrik yöntem ile hacim hesabı (Proje No. 105M179). TÜBİTAK.
[17] Abellán, A., Vilaplana, J. M., & Martínez, J. (2006). Application of a long-range terrestrial laser scanner to a detailed rockfall study at Vall de Núria (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Engineering Geology, 88(3–4), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.012
[18] Yilmaz, H. M., Yakar, M., Yildiz, F., Karabork, H., Kavurmaci, M. M., Mutluoglu, O., & Goktepe, A. (2010). Determining rates of erosion of an earth pillar by terrestrial laser scanning. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 35(2A), 163–172.
[19] Lague, D., Brodu, N., & Leroux, J. (2013). Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z). ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 82, 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009
[20] Promneewat, K., & Taksavasu, T. (2024). Performance of affordable 2D cave scanning technique from LiDAR for constructing 3D cave models. Advanced LiDAR, 4(1), 1–8.
[21] Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). 3D ship modeling with laser scanning method. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applied Geoinformatics (ISAG2021), Riga, Latvia, 2–3 December. https://doi.org/10.15659/isag2021.12314
[22] Özeren, Ö., & Korumaz, M. (2021). Lidar to HBIM for analysis of historical buildings. Advanced LiDAR, 1(1), 27–31.
[23] Karabork, H., Yildiz, F., Yakar, M., Altuntas, C., & Karasaka, L. (2007). Modeling and visualization using laser scanner in documentation of cultural heritage. In XXI International CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece.
[24] Goktepe, A., Karabork, H., Yakar, M., Yildiz, F., & Baygul, E. (2009). 3D modeling of Sille Aya-i Eleni Church with laser technology. In 22nd CIPA Symposium—Digital Documentation, Interpretation & Presentation of Cultural Heritage, Kyoto, Japan.
[25] Güleç Korumaz, A., Korumaz, M., Dülgerler, O. N., Karasaka, L., Yildiz, F., & Yakar, M. (2010). Evaluation of laser scanner performance in documentation of historical and architectural ruins, a case study in Konya. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(Part 5), 361–366.
[26] Çelik, M. Ö., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2019). Modelling of the mausoleum in Kanlidivane ruins with terrestrial laser scanner. In 2nd International Mersin Symposium, Mersin, Türkiye, 23–25 May.
[27] Köse, S., & Us, H. (2023). Application of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) technology for documentation of cultural heritage buildings and structures: A case study Sarı İsmail Sultan Tomb. Advanced LiDAR, 3(1), 35–40.
[28] Kanun, E., Metin, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). Yersel lazer tarama tekniği kullanarak Ağzıkara Han’ın 3 boyutlu nokta bulutunun elde edilmesi. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 3(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.51946/melid.1025856
[29] Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2023). Investigating the material deteriorations on the facades of stone structures by terrestrial laser scanning method: Case study of Mardin mansion. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(3), 700–711. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1197891
[30] Alyilmaz, C., Alyilmaz, S., & Yakar, M. (2010). Measurement of petroglyhps (rock of arts) of Qobustan with close range photogrammetry. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(Part 5), 29–32.
[31] Kaderli, L. (2021). Documentation methods from tradition to the present: Case study Cappadocia. Advanced LiDAR, 1(1), 18–26.
[32] Özdemir, İ., & Güngör, A. (2024). Documentation of archaeological excavation sites with terrestrial laser scanning and UAV photogrammetry methods. Advanced LiDAR, 4(1), 28–32.
