Monitoring Coastal Erosion and Sediment Accumulation in The Kızılırmak Delta Using UAVs and Photogrammetry
Keywords:
Coastal change, UAV, Photogrammetry, Kızılırmak DeltaAbstract
Areas around the coast and delta offer significant resources and business prospects, but they are also susceptible to human activity and natural calamities. In order to tackle these concerns, it is crucial to consistently observe and analyze coastal and delta regions to comprehend the ongoing alterations and enforce essential measures to safeguard the ecosystem and the communities reliant on it. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) possess the capacity to efficiently and inexpensively cover vast areas. UAVs, or unmanned aerial vehicles, have gained significant popularity in recent years for the purpose of monitoring and investigating coastal and delta regions. The Kızılırmak Delta in Turkey has been adversely affected by human activity, including the construction of dams and the extraction of sand, resulting in a reduction in the delta's dimensions and biodiversity. This study employs photogrammetric techniques and UAVs to observe and analyze the alterations occurring in the Kızılırmak Delta in Turkey. Consequently, the shorelines generated using photogrammetric techniques in the region where the spurs were built are being compared to the shorelines obtained by terrestrial approaches. Research indicates that the construction of spurs effectively halted coastal erosion in specific regions. However, in other locations, coastal regression persisted, and sediment buildup led to movement of the coastline towards the sea in certain sections. This methodology can be employed to formulate efficient strategies for safeguarding and revitalizing the
Kızılırmak Delta and analogous regions.
References
1. Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2020). Determination of pond volume with using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 2(2), 59-63.
2. Yakar, M. (2011). Using close range photogrammetry to measure the position of inaccessible geological features. Experimental Techniques, 35(1), 54-59.
3. Maune, D. F. (2001). Digital elevation model technologies and applications: The DEM User manual. The American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. ISBN:1-57083-064-9
4. Ulvi, A., Varol, F.i & Yiğit, A. Y. (2019). 3D modeling of cultural heritage: the example of Muyi Mubarek Mosque in Uzbekistan (Hz. Osman’s Mushafi). International Congress on Cultural Heritage and Tourism (ICCHT), 115-123, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
5. Yakar, M., Yılmaz, H. M., & Mutluoglu, O. (2014). Performance of photogrammetric and terrestrial laser scanning methods in volume computing of excavation and filling areas. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39, 387-394.
1. Konuk N. (2018), Utilization and planning of coastal areas in Ordu Province, Turkey, Global NEST Journal, 20(1), 147-150.
2. Utomo S.W., Risdianto R.K., Tambunan R.P. and Hernawan U. (2021), Environmental sensitivity index analysis for coastal protection of oil spill in Fakfak, Papua, Indonesia, Global NEST Journal, 23(2), 241-248. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.003566
3. Sesli F.A. (2006), Monitoring Changes in Coastal Areas with Digital Photogrammetry, Journal of Geodesy, Geoinformation and Land Management, 95, 11-17.
4. Labuz, T. (2015), “Environmental impacts-coastal erosion and coastline changes,” in Second Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin, Regional Climate Studies, ed. The BACCII Author Team (Cham: Springer), 381–396.
5. Ventura, D., Bonifazi, A., Gravina, M. F., & Ardizzone, G. (2017). Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) for Environmental Monitoring: A Review with Applications in Coastal Habitats. In O. D. L. Mejia, & J. A. E. Gomez (Eds.), Aerial Robots - Aerodynamics, Control and Applications. IntechOpen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69598
6. Uzun S.M. and Garipağaoğlu N. (2014), Evaluation of Izmit Coasts in Terms of Risks to be Created by Coastline Change, International Journal of Social Studies, 7:31, 470-480.
7. Marghany M. (2014). Simulation of Three-Dimesional of Coastal Erosion Using Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar, Global NEST Journal, 16(1), 80-86.
8. Karadağ A.A. (2012), Determination of the Lower Basin Boundaries of Lake Kovada, Duzce University Journal of Forestry, 8:1, 58-76.
9. Şahin K. and Bağcı H.R. (2016), Evaluation of Morphometric Properties of Major Deltas with GIS and RS Techniques, International Journal of Social Studies, 9:42, 984-990.
10. Thi T., Trung T., Oanh P., Thang D., Nga D., (2020), Impact of Climate Change on the Environmental Security of the Mekong River Delta Area, European Journal of Climate Change, 2, 11-21.
11. Yılmaz C. (2005), Geographical Analysis of Coastal Erosion in the Kızılırmak Delta, V. Turkish Quaternary Symposium, Istanbul Technical University Eurasian Geosciences Institute Publications, 227 – 234., İstanbul, Turkey.
12. Anlı A., Polat E., Semiz D. (2011), Analysis of Kırşehir Province Drought and Its Effect on Wetlands, 2. Turkey Wetlands Congress, Kırşehir, Turkey.
13. Ersoy A., Turan N., Arslan H., Kuleyin A. (2021), Assessment of Seawater Intrusion in Kızılırmak Delta Coastal Area (North Turkey) Using Hydrochemical and Isotopic Data. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80, 400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09700-9
14. Ataol M., Kale M.M., Tekkanat İ.S. (2019) Assessment of The Changes in Shoreline Using Digital Shoreline Analysis System: A Case Study of Kızılırmak Delta in Northern Turkey from 1951 to 2017, Environmental Earth Sciences, 78, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8591-7
15. Özturk D., Beyazit I., Kilic F. (2015), Spatiotemporal Analysis of Shoreline Changes of the Kizilirmak Delta, Journal of Coastal Research, 31 (6), 1389-1402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00159.1
16. Nazeer M., Waqas M., Shahzad M.I., Zia I., Wu W. (2020), Coastline Vulnerability Assessment through Landsat and Cubesats in a Coastal Mega City. Remote Sensing., 12, 749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050749
17. Zeybek H.İ., Uzun A., Yılmaz C., Özdemir S. (2011), Consequences of Shoreline Changes in the Kızılırmak Delta, Samsun Symposium (Volume II), 885-896, Samsun, Turkey.
18. Bal M., Oğuz D., Bilir M., Torun Z., Sevil Y., Yavuz N., Erciyas Y. (2021). Take Action for the Northern Lapwings: Monitoring and Awareness Raising Acitivities in Kizilirmak Delta, a Ramsar Site in Northern Turkey, International Wader Study Group Annual Conference, 08-10 October 2021.
19. Silwal, A., Tamang, S., & Adhikari, R. (2022). Use of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for mapping, and accuracy assessment of the orthophoto with and without using GCPs: A case study in Nepal. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 4(2), 45-52
20. Şenkal E, Kaplan G & Avdan U (2021). Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(2), 81-89
21. Ishaand B., and Adib M.R.M., 2021 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1144 012060
22. Casella, E., Rovere, A., Pedroncini, A. et al. Drones as tools for monitoring beach topography changes in the Ligurian Sea (NW Mediterranean). Geo-Mar Lett 36, 151–163 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-016-0435-9
23. Chapapría, V. E., Peris, J. S., & González-Escrivá, J. A. (2022). Coastal Monitoring Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for the Management of the Spanish Mediterranean Coast: The Case of Almenara-Sagunto. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5457. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095457
24. Yang Z., Yu X., Dedman S., Rosso M., Zhu J., Yang J., Xia Y., Tian Y., Zhang G., Wang J., UAV remote sensing applications in marine monitoring: Knowledge visualization and review, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 838, Part 1, 2022, 155939, ISSN 0048-9697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155939.
25. Papaknstantinou A., Topouzelis K., Pavlogeorgatos G. (2016) Coastline Zones Identification and 3D Coastal Mapping Using UAV Spatial Data, International Journal of Geo-Information, 5:75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5060075
26. Kokeza Z., Vujasinović M., Govedarica M., Milojević B., Jakovljević G. (2020). Automatic building footprint extraction from UAV images using neural networks. Geodetski vestnik, 64 (4), 545-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2020.04.545-561
27. Yoo C.I. and Oh T.S., (2016), Beach Volume Change Using UAV Photogrammetry Songjung Beach Korea, XXIII ISPRS Congress, Prague, Czech Republic.
28. Mancini F., Dubbini M, Gattelli M., Stecchi F., Fabbri S. and Gabbianelli G. 2013. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for High-Resolution Reconstruction of Topography: The Structure from Motion Approach on Coastal Environments. Remote Sensing, 5:12, 6880-6898, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5126880
29. Laport e-Fauret Q., Marieu V., Castelle B., Michalet R., Bujan S., Rosebery D. (2019), Low- Cost UAV for High-Resolution and Large-Scale Coastal Dune Change Monitoring Using Photogrammetry, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7:63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7030063
30. Flener C, Vaaja M, Jaakkola A, Krooks A, Kaartinen H, Kukko A, Kasvi E, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J, Alho P. Seamless Mapping of River Channels at High Resolution Using Mobile LiDAR and UAV-Photography. Remote Sensing. 2013; 5(12):6382-6407. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5126382
31. Hugenholtz, C., H., Hugenholtz, N., Levin, T.E. Barchyn, M.C. Baddock Remote sensing and spatial analysis of aeolian sand dunes: a review and outlook Earth-Sci. Rev., 111 (2012), pp. 319-334,
https://doi.org 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.006
32. Öztürk D. and Sesli F.A. (2015), Shoreline change analysis of the Kizilirmak Lagoon Series, Ocean & Coastal Management, 118 (B), 290-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.03.009
33. Maraş, E. E., Nasery, M. N. (2023). Investigating the length, area and volume measurement accuracy of UAV-Based oblique photogrammetry models produced with and without ground control points. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 8(1), 32-51. DOI: 10.26833/ijeg.1017176sium (Volume II), 885-896, Samsun, Turkey.
